Senate panel's report details divisions over spy measure
Report sheds new light on conflicts that flared during closed-door markup of bill to revise the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
In a newly released report, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee detail continuing concerns about a bill to control the Bush administration's electronic surveillance activities, including changes they will try to make as the legislation heads to the Senate floor.
The 52-page report, published Friday to accompany the committee's bill to revise the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, sheds new light on conflicts that flared during the panel's closed-door markup on Oct. 18. Taking exception with the majority view, Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Russell Feingold, D-Wis., criticize the committee for not adopting three amendments they offered.
One amendment would have given the secret FISA court a greater role in overseeing the administration's spying activities. They said the amendment's defeat "leaves in place what we believe are inadequate mechanisms for protecting the privacy of Americans' communications."
Another amendment would have limited how the administration can use information collected about U.S. citizens or legal residents.
"The defeat of that amendment means that, even when the court finds that the government's procedures are targeting Americans in the United States without a warrant, the government can continue to use the information obtained through that surveillance however it sees fit," they wrote. "This loophole offers an invitation to warrantless wiretapping."
A third amendment would have required all provisions in the bill to expire at the end of December 2009, rather than December 2013. Wyden and Feingold tried unsuccessfully to strip a provision in the bill granting retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies that have assisted the Bush administration with warrantless surveillance activities dating back to September 2001. Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., announced in a floor speech Friday he would object to allowing the bill to come to the Senate floor if it retains that provision.
Wyden, Feingold and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., were successful in attaching an amendment that requires the administration to get court approval in order to target the communications of a U.S. citizen or legal resident abroad. Senate Intelligence ranking member Christopher (Kit) Bond, R-Mo., along with three other Republicans on the committee, wrote that the amendment could doom the bill.
The senators wrote that the amendment's language has "significant technical and legal problems ... that would cause the intelligence community to lose valuable intelligence on certain U.S. persons who are spying for a foreign power or supporting terrorism." They added that they "remain hopeful that we will be able to reach a compromise on this issue when we get to the floor."
In a show of bipartisan unity, Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., wrote that they still want to clarify that the White House cannot circumvent FISA while conducting surveillance.
"We continue to believe that Congress must write strong language to ensure that FISA is the exclusive means that the intelligence community may intercept, analyze, and disseminate the phone and electronic communications of any American for intelligence purposes," they wrote. "We will work to strengthen the exclusivity language as the bill progresses."
Whitehouse added that he has drafted another amendment to clarify that the FISA court has the authority to review how the administration is complying with rules to minimize the surveillance and use of communications by U.S. citizens and legal residents. "This change is not yet a part of the bill, but I will continue to press for the court's clear authority to check on the implementation of these minimization procedures," he wrote.
NEXT STORY: Quote of the Day