Government Executive - Oversight

Project 2025 contributor nominated for government watchdog position

Sean Michael Newhouse — Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:14:05 -0400

President Donald Trump on Aug. 7 nominated Dennis Kirk, a co-author of Project 2025, to serve as inspector general for the Interior Department.

“Inspectors general must be able to investigate the administration that appointed them without fear or favor,” said former Interior IG Mark Lee Greenblatt, who was removed in a mass firing of the watchdogs at the start of Trump’s second term, in a statement. “Mr. Kirk’s political background and close ties to this administration make it impossible for him to credibly meet that fundamental test.”

While Kirk is newly nominated to lead the Interior IG office, Greenblatt and Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif., the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, last week said that Kirk had been installed as a political appointee within the Interior IG office.

“That same office is weighing serious ethics investigations into senior officials in this administration,” Huffman said in a statement at the time. “It’s no surprise the White House suddenly wants its own man inside the one place that Trump's cronies still have reason to fear.”

Kirk co-wrote a chapter in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 conservative presidential transitional initiative about managing the civil service. And in 2025, The Washington Post reported that former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard assigned Kirk, then one of her advisers, to a position within the IG for the intelligence community.

Steve Katz — who served in several senior oversight roles on Capitol Hill and in the executive branch, including assisting the Clinton administration develop standards for selecting IG nominees — argued Kirk’s nomination violates rules regarding IG selections.

Specifically, he pointed to statute that IG appointments should be made “without regard to political affiliation” and federal auditing standards developed by the Government Accountability Office that warn against “the threat that an auditor will, as a result of political, ideological, social or other convictions, take a position that is not objective.”

“The purpose of having professional auditors — not political ones — is because Congress needs those [IG] reports to exercise its constitutional responsibilities for checks and balances,” he said.

During Trump’s first term, the president nominated Kirk to serve as chairman of the Merit Systems Protection Board, but he never received a vote on the Senate floor. Kirk also held a senior position at the Office of Personnel Management and was involved in an effort to crack down on agency diversity trainings.

Two Senate Democrats last week requested that the Interior IG investigate the renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. dropped charges against several individuals accused of vandalizing the landmark. Instead, federal prosecutors now say that the damage to the pool’s new lining was likely caused by faulty contractor work.

Most of the IGs who the Senate has confirmed since the start of Trump’s second term worked in his first or second administration. Additionally, the Partnership for Public Service nonprofit recently reported that the Trump administration assigned political appointees to the IG offices at the Housing and Urban Development and Labor departments for the first time in recent history.

]]>

Key oversight and federal workforce nominees confirmed by Senate

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:37:20 -0400

The Senate on Friday confirmed in a 51-47 party-line vote multiple executive branch nominees, including several involved in government oversight and federal employee matters.

Justice Department Inspector General

Since President Donald Trump fired nearly 20 of the agency watchdogs at the start of his second term, most of the individuals who have been approved as replacements previously worked in the first or second Trump administration, which government oversight advocates argue threatens the independent nature of IG offices.

But Don Berthiaume, the newly confirmed watchdog at DOJ, is a career IG employee. Most recently, he served as a senior adviser in the office he now leads and had a stint as acting DOJ IG from October 2025 through January 2026 but was limited by rules for how long an individual can serve in an acting position.

During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Berthiaume testified that he has a personal appreciation for whistleblowers, as he himself was one while at the Drug Enforcement Administration.

“That experience taught me that whistleblowers are not abstractions, they are public servants who often take personal and professional risks to bring forward information the government needs to hear. It also taught me that the OIG functions best when it is operationally independent, but not isolated,” he said. “The OIG must retain full authority over what it reviews, how it conducts its work and what conclusions it reaches. But effective oversight also benefits from good information sharing, open lines of communication and professional engagement with the components it oversees.”

The DOJ IG has historically taken on high-profile cases. For example, Berthiaume has worked on a review of the FBI’s use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorities against Trump 2016 campaign staffers. And he told senators that he is aiming to complete an audit of the DOJ’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act within one year.

Federal Labor Relations Authority General Counsel

A backlog of hundreds of cases has piled up at this agency, which manages labor-management relations for the civil service, due to there not being a Senate-confirmed general counsel.

But many federal employee unions opposed the nomination of Charlton Allen, a conservative lawyer, arguing that he lacks experience in labor relations and pointing out that, while running for a state elected position in 2012, he said public employees shouldn’t be allowed to unionize.

The unions also flagged that Allen, while a student at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in the early 1990s, ran a student publication that featured racist attacks.

During his confirmation hearing, Democratic senators asked Allen about a cover of that publication, which featured a Jewish candidate for student body president with horns and a pitchfork. The nominee said that the cover was a “mistake” but that it was referencing UNC’s rival — the Duke University Blue Devils.

Special Counsel

While he was confirmed on Friday, Charles Baldis is not new to the Office of Special Counsel, which protects feds from prohibited personnel practices — including retaliation for whistleblowing. Baldis, a former Senate staffer, has been the designee of the agency’s acting chief since spring 2025 while also serving as OSC’s chief counsel.

The president’s first OSC nominee, Paul Ingrassia, withdrew in October 2025 following objections from Senate Republicans over reports of sexual harassment accusations and racist text messages. In March 2025, Trump removed the incumbent special counsel — Hampton Dellinger, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden — before the end of his five-year term.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator

The government’s disaster response and recovery agency now has a Senate-confirmed leader for the first time since the start of the second Trump administration.

Cameron Hamilton, the new chief, served as acting administrator at the start of 2025 but was fired after testifying to Congress that he did "not believe it is in the best interest of the American people to eliminate [FEMA].” The president and other administration officials have proposed axing the agency.

The White House-backed FEMA Review Council in May recommended reducing the size of the agency while giving state and local governments a larger share of responsibilities following emergencies.

The Government Accountability Office recently reported that FEMA pushed thousands of its employees out in 2025 and 2026 without considering the impact that doing so would have on fulfilling the agency’s mission.

Merit Systems Protection Board Chairman

James Woodruff, who has been a Republican member of the MSPB since October 2025, is now the chairman of the agency, which hears appeals for federal employee disciplinary actions.

Henry Kerner, the board’s other GOP member, had been serving as acting chairman.

The MSPB is led by three board members, but no more than two can be from the same political party. Trump last year fired Cathy Harris, a Democratic member of the board, for no specified reason. While she appealed her removal, the Supreme Court in June ruled in a separate case that the president can fire bipartisan board members of independent agencies without cause.

Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director

Hal Duncan, who already holds a senior position in the White House budget office, was confirmed as the agency’s number two leader. During his hearing, Democratic senators criticized a proposed OMB rule to overhaul the federal grantmaking process, including by requiring political appointees to approve awards to ensure they advance the president’s priorities.

The bipartisan Senate agreement to avoid a government shutdown on Oct. 1 includes language that would temporarily freeze OMB’s proposed rule. As of Friday afternoon, it’s unclear if senators will vote on the continuing resolution before the start of a five-week recess.

]]>

Calls for IG probe of Reflecting Pool renovation come amid questions over watchdog's independence

Sean Michael Newhouse — Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:40:10 -0400

Two Democratic senators on Tuesday asked for an investigation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation by the Interior Department inspector general, an independent oversight office whose former leader and a lawmaker say is the new workplace of a Trump political appointee.

Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., the ranking members of the Environment and Public Works and Energy and Natural Resources committees respectively, submitted their request after the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. dropped charges against several individuals accused of vandalizing the landmark. Instead, federal prosecutors now say that the damage to the pool’s new lining was likely caused by faulty contractor work.

Bare patches are visible where newly applied blue paint has peeled from the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on June 20, 2026.

KEN CEDENO /GETTY IMAGES

“We urge your office to open an immediate investigation into DOI’s knowledge of coating and peeling issues with the Reflecting Pool — including what was known, who knew it and when they knew it — and whether DOI employees intentionally withheld evidence from USAO-DC,” the senators wrote.

Caryl Brzymialkiewicz, the deputy IG at Interior, is currently leading the office after IG Mark Lee Greenblatt was removed in a mass firing of the watchdogs at the start of Trump’s second term.

On Tuesday, Greenblatt alleged that Dennis Kirk, a co-author of the conservative Project 2025 presidential transition initiative, was installed at the Interior IG.

“This is not about one individual, or whether Mr. Kirk is capable or well-intentioned,” Greenblatt said in a statement. “It is about whether placing a political operative inside an independent watchdog office creates a structural conflict that undermines public confidence in the office's independence.”

Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif., the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, also criticized Kirk’s apparent appointment in a statement on Wednesday.

“This man helped write the Project 2025 playbook for seizing control of the federal workforce. Now he sits inside the office charged with rooting out corruption at Interior — the department that manages our national parks, public lands, Tribal programs, and now under Trump, gold-slathered statues and a botched Reflecting Pool renovation,” he said. “That same office is weighing serious ethics investigations into senior officials in this administration. It’s no surprise the White House suddenly wants its own man inside the one place that Trump's cronies still have reason to fear.”

In response to questions about the Reflecting Pool investigation request and Kirk’s alleged appointment, a spokesperson for the Interior IG said the office has no comment.

The Washington Post reported that in 2025 former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard assigned Kirk, then one of her advisers, to a position at the IG for the intelligence community.

In June, the Partnership for Public Service reported that the Trump administration placed political appointees in the IG offices at the Housing and Urban Development and Labor departments. The nonprofit said that it’s rare for such government officials to work for the watchdogs because “it introduces a structural conflict of interest into an institution whose effectiveness depends on independence.”

]]>

Watchdog puts new numbers on the size of DOGE, but many details remain unknown as agencies refuse to turn over information

Sean Michael Newhouse — Wed, 05 Aug 2026 16:52:42 -0400

The Government Accountability Office on Wednesday published a report that uncovered more information about the individuals who worked for the Department of Government Efficiency. Still, the congressional watchdog’s findings were limited, including with respect to whether the DOGE employees completed required ethics training and paperwork, due to a lack of cooperation from agencies.

Investigators determined that there were at least 206 employees who worked for the Trump administration’s cost-cutting entity that held positions in the Executive Office of the President, even if they were detailed to other agencies, between Jan. 20, 2025, and Jan. 31, 2026. That number excludes DOGE staffers who were not assigned to the EOP.

GAO found that at least 128 of these individuals separated from their EOP positions by Jan. 31, 2026.

Of those 206 staffers, at least 27 were special government employees, meaning they could not serve for more than 130 days during any one-year period. For example, Elon Musk, the former de facto head of DOGE, was an SGE, which raised conflict of interest questions due to his companies receiving billions in federal contracts.

However investigators were not able to determine the appointment type, such as Schedule C political appointee or noncareer Senior Executive Service, for more than 150 of the personnel because many agencies did not provide the requested information.

“This total includes the 127 [U.S. DOGE Service] employees who held titles as digital services experts or consultants within USDS,” according to the report. “Although USDS has stated that USDS positions last no more than 4 years, we were unable to determine whether these USDS employees or other personnel had held such time-limited appointments.”

In total, 10 agencies and the EOP did not respond to requests from GAO for records that these DOGE employees participated in ethics training and completed financial disclosure reports.

“As a result, we are not able to determine the total number of DOGE personnel who held positions within EOP who received trainings or who completed financial disclosures at those 10 agencies or at EOP,” investigators wrote.

Nine agencies, covering 64 DOGE employees, did submit information about whether the staffers did such training and reports. But GAO argued that much of the documentation was incomplete. For example, the Agriculture Department provided an “ethics-related presentation” for Trump appointees but didn’t offer evidence for when, or if, the DOGE staffers received the training.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

While “the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization” terminated on July 4, pursuant to the executive order establishing it, GAO pointed out that the directive permanently renamed an existing White House office as the U.S. DOGE Service.

“Since the EO does not call for the termination of the broader USDS entity, it is possible that USDS and personnel at federal agencies could continue to do work that advances some of these initiatives after the temporary organization’s termination,” investigators wrote.

DOGE spearheaded many of the civil service reductions that took place last year, resulting in a decrease of more than 350,000 to the federal employee headcount.

GAO in April reported that the Treasury Department and DOGE did not follow all security protocols with respect to granting access to government payment systems.

]]>

FEMA slashed staff without considering the effects on future disaster response, watchdog reports

Sean Michael Newhouse — Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:49:00 -0400

The Federal Emergency Management Agency cuts its workforce without assessing how that would impact disaster response and recovery, the Government Accountability Office determined in a report published Tuesday.

Despite previous reports that staffing shortages have impeded past recovery efforts, FEMA in 2025 and 2026 pushed staffers to take voluntary separation incentives like the deferred resignation program and fired new and recently promoted employees who were still in their probationary periods.

Ultimately, GAO found that about 17% of FEMA’s workforce, more than 4,300 employees, separated in fiscal 2025 and that, as of April, the agency employed nearly 21,000 staffers.

“DHS and FEMA did not assess whether offering the voluntary workforce reduction programs to employees would improve or limit FEMA’s ability to meet its mission needs moving forward, and the effort was not targeted or limited based on the agency’s workforce needs and gaps,” investigators wrote.

The report also covers a FEMA decision last winter to not renew the contracts for hundreds of temporary full-time Cadre of On-Call Response/Recovery Employees, who are the largest contingent in the agency’s workforce. But officials in May — after Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin replaced Kristi Noem — offered impacted individuals their positions back.

“We found no evidence that DHS and FEMA leadership assessed whether the nonrenewal of CORE employees’ contracts in January 2026 would affect FEMA’s ability to respond to disasters,” investigators wrote.

They also reported that FEMA was under a hiring freeze from January 2025 through May 2026, except for roles deemed “essential” or “mission-critical” by DHS.

A lawsuit against the FEMA staff cuts likewise revealed that agency officials at one point proposed halving the disaster agency’s workforce without determining which roles should be shed.

GAO also flagged that FEMA in May 2025 rescinded its strategic plan and that, while officials said they would promptly create a new one, they haven’t yet.

“Without a strategic plan that outlines clear goals and objectives, FEMA continues to operate without the strategic direction on which to base its analysis of future workforce needs to ensure it can meet its mission,” investigators wrote.

Officials told GAO that strategic planning was delayed by the activities of the FEMA Review Council. While President Donald Trump at one point mused about eliminating the disaster agency, the White House-backed review council in May instead recommended reducing FEMA’s footprint and giving state and local governments a larger share of responsibility after emergencies.

GAO recommended that FEMA develop a strategic plan and conduct a workforce analysis to assess staffing and mission needs. DHS concurred with the suggestions but said implementation is contingent on the agency getting a new Senate-confirmed leader.

The Senate is expected to consider the nomination of Cameron Hamilton to be FEMA administrator, which is part of an en bloc package of executive branch nominees to be voted on, in the near future. He led the agency in an acting capacity at the start of 2025 but was fired after testifying to Congress that he did "not believe it is in the best interest of the American people” to eliminate FEMA.

Rep. Bennie G. Thompson, D-Miss., the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said that GAO’s report “confirms what we have been saying for over a year.”

“The Trump administration’s drastic cuts to FEMA’s workforce — as well as forcing thousands of personnel to quit — have damaged the agency’s ability to respond to disasters and has rid it of critical institutional knowledge,” he said in a statement.

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers also advanced out of committee a bill that would overhaul FEMA, including by making it an independent, cabinet-level agency.

]]>

Inspectors general are conducting fewer oversight reports after 18 months of upheaval

Sean Michael Newhouse — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:53:02 -0400

Agency offices of inspectors general have performed less oversight work since President Donald Trump fired many of the independent watchdogs and pushed out swaths of staffers, according to a report published Wednesday by a good government nonprofit.

“Inspectors general are the mechanism by which the executive branch examines itself, and the volume of that examination has declined sharply in a single year,” the Partnership for Public Service researchers wrote. “The result is not a leaner oversight operation. It is agencies with less scrutiny of their programs and their personnel.”

Compared with the average between fiscal 2020 and 2024, OIGs for Cabinet departments in the first half of fiscal 2026 produced an average of 6% fewer audits and 25% fewer investigative reports. Audits are a review of an agency’s program, while investigations look into alleged misconduct.

“Every report that did not happen represents oversight that did not occur,” the researchers wrote. “An audit not conducted means a program went unexamined — no findings, no recommendations and no formal decision the agency must make and answer for. An investigation not opened means an allegation went unresolved and lost taxpayer dollars were never recovered.”

Additionally, the Partnership reported that, as of May 31, the average Cabinet OIG workforce is 19% smaller than it was in December 2024. The researchers found that the three offices with the most significant staffing losses also experienced the largest reductions in investigative reports.

“Investigations are mostly discretionary, left to the OIG’s judgment as to which are necessary or desirable,” they wrote. “When an office loses a quarter of its staff, the discretionary work is the first to go.”

Trump has fired nearly 20 IGs since the start of his second term, with the White House arguing that the oversight officials have become “corrupt, partisan and in some cases, have lied to the public.” Most of the IGs who the Senate has confirmed since January 2025 previously served in the president’s first or second administration.

The Partnership also has reported that the administration proposed cutting funding for OIGs in its fiscal 2027 budget request and installed political appointees at certain IG offices, which the organization contended “introduces a structural conflict of interest.”

]]>

Dem senators demand answers on SSA field office closures despite Bisignano’s vow

Erich Wagner — Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0400

This story has been updated at 4:30 p.m. ET.

A group of Senate Democrats on Tuesday demanded information on how staffing shortages and reassignments are impacting the Social Security Administration’s ability to keep its 1,200 field offices open to the public.

Last year, after years of chronic underfunding of SSA’s administrative functions already brought its workforce to a 50-year low, the Trump administration shaved the agency’s headcount by another 7,500 employees. According to OPM data, SSA had around 49,500 employees as of May. Bisignano has also reassigned more than 1,500 employees from the field offices and other subcomponents to man Social Security's 1-800 customer service line.

Earlier this year, Bisignano wrote in a private letter to Warren that he would “keep every field office open” and ensure they are “providing better and high-quality service.” But over the last several months, dozens of field offices have been listed at various points either closed entirely or only offered services via telephone. As of Monday afternoon, 16 field offices across the country provided no or limited services.

In a letter to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano Tuesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and three other Democrats requested information on these temporary closures and the underlying reasons for each shuttering.

“Many of these offices were reportedly closed to the public due to maintenance needs or other operational issues—which may be a valid reason,” the lawmakers wrote. “But several offices appear to have been effectively closed due to staffing shortages, and some of these offices have allegedly remained ‘temporarily closed’ for an extended period of time.”

Last April, union leaders spoke to Government Executive about three rural field offices that had already been closed for over a year. Two of those locations—Bloomsburg, Pa., and Logan, W.Va.—remain on SSA’s list of closures.

“These closures are not unprecedented, and have occurred under previous Republican and Democratic presidents,” Warren wrote. “But in your case, these temporary closures to the public come after you made explicit commitments not to close offices, and have made a series of ongoing staffing cuts and assignment changes that appear to have added to the threat of closures.”

Additionally, Bisignano testified—falsely—last month that his predecessor, former Commissioner Martin O’Malley, instituted a policy for field offices by which members of the public were “turned away” if they had not previously scheduled an appointment. But as of Monday afternoon, the field office in Silver Spring, Md., offers only “limited in-person service with an appointment.”

The lawmakers wrote that the field offices mostly likely to suffer from staffing shortage are often the most rural locations, and their temporary closure create greater challenges for Americans seeking in-person service.

“Closing field offices and resident stations for in-person services also means Americans must travel further to get assistance,” they wrote. “In fact, recent analysis finds the closure of any field office would double the time it takes the average American to drive to their second-closest office.”

In a statement Tuesday, an SSA spokesperson contested Warren and union officials’ assertion that the closures are at least partially due to staffing gaps. They said both the Bloomsburg, Pa., and Logan, W.Va., field offices remain closed due to structural issues but did not give a timeline for their reopening or replacement.

“None of SSA's field offices are closed or offering limited service due to staffing issues,” the spokesperson wrote. “The field office closures listed on the Social Security website are not permanent. The offices are temporarily closed or providing limited service due to planned renovations, required maintenance, or facilities issues that we are actively working with GSA and building owners to resolve. SSA’s resident stations are located in rural areas and typically have one or two employees assigned to provide in-person services.”

]]>

Bill aims to end blocked congressional access at federal buildings

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:19:58 -0400

House Democrats on Wednesday introduced legislation that would require agencies to provide members of Congress with greater access to government facilities for oversight purposes.

“I have personally been denied access to [U.S. Agency for International Development], the U.S. Institute of Peace, a public meeting at the Department of the Interior and repeatedly delayed in conducting oversight at [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] facilities,” said Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., the bill’s sponsor, in a statement. “All of these were clear examples of the Trump administration’s deliberate and repeated efforts to deny, delay or obstruct congressional oversight of the executive branch.”

Specifically, the Congressional Oversight and Agency Access Act (H.R. 9835) would grant members of Congress and accompanying staffers access to any “public building” during regular business hours. Agencies would be mandated to provide access outside of those hours and, if certain conditions are met, to areas that require a security clearance within 24 hours after a lawmaker’s request.

The bill’s requirements would apply even during a presidentially declared emergency or Health and Human Services Department-designed public health emergency. And the definition of “public building” in the bill includes contractor-owned and -operated facilities.

The measure’s introduction comes during a legal battle over a requirement from the Homeland Security Department, which is spearheading increased deportations, for a seven-day notice before congressional oversight visits at immigration detention facilities. In March, a district judge issued a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the policy. The Trump administration then sought an emergency stay, which was rejected by an appeals court.

Earlier this year, in defense of the seven-day notice requirement, former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem wrote that “unannounced visits require pulling ICE officers away from their normal duties” and that “there is an increasing trend of replacing legitimate oversight activities with circus-like publicity stunts.”

Beyer’s bill is cosponsored by eight other House Democrats and the Project on Government Oversight.

“Congress cannot fulfill its constitutional oversight responsibilities if members of Congress are denied access to the very agencies they are charged with overseeing,” the nonprofit said in a statement. “The Congressional Oversight and Agency Access Act reaffirms Congress’s authority to conduct meaningful oversight and helps ensure transparency and accountability across the executive branch.”

]]>

Despite firings, acting IG says it’s 'the best time to be in the inspector general community' due to focus on fraud

Sean Michael Newhouse — Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:49:40 -0400

The work of inspectors general to detect and prevent scams has become increasingly important as the Trump administration prioritizes combating fraud in government programs, a panel of the agency watchdogs said Wednesday during a conference in Washington, D.C., sponsored by AGA, formerly known as the Association of Government Accountants.

“This is probably the best time to be in the inspector general community, where there's the renewed focus on fraud, waste and abuse,” said acting Education Department inspector general Mark Priebe.

Even so, members of the audience did ask about the president’s unprecedented firing last year of nearly 20 IGs and whether that is impacting their oversight work. Priebe said that he’s not concerned.

“If a new administration comes in and says we want all of our own IGs, that's fine,” he said. “I really think that the executive branch should have some say over their policies and their procedures and how they enact that.”

Government Executive has reported that Priebe, who previously served as a senior official in the Education IG, appears to have shared social media posts supporting Trump. While IGs are political appointees, they’ve historically served across administrations. Experts have warned that replacing them each time there’s a transfer of power would weaken independent government oversight.

Still, Priebe said that the Trump administration’s push to dismantle the Education Department, which has resulted in the halving of the agency’s workforce, is affecting his IG office.

“We're losing agents and auditors because they're not sure what's going to happen,” he said. “So that's an additional area that we're concerned with — to have a staff and to be able to check the department and go out into the public and fight fraud.”

Based on federal workforce data, Education’s IG office has gone from more than 200 staffers in 2024 to nearly 150 currently.

The IGs on the panel also discussed the challenges of detecting fraud as technology advances.

For example, Fara Damelin, the inspector general of the Federal Communications Commission, said that analyzing metadata is an integral method to verifying the authenticity of a document.

“That's why the government needs to get smarter and use all the technology out there,” she said.

But Priebe warned, based on a recent summit he attended, that fraudsters are figuring out ways to modify metadata.

The watchdogs also said that IG offices are attempting to move away from investigating fraud after it happens and instead prioritize stopping scams before they occur. Kenneth Dieffenbach — the executive director of the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee, which oversees COVID-19 and One Big Beautiful Bill Act spending — described it as going from a “pay and chase” to a “prevent and relax” model.

“Sometimes when we start an audit or an engagement with our agency, they're like, ‘Well, you can't look at that right now. We're still implementing this program,’” added Eric Rivera, the assistant IG for Audits at the Export-Import Bank OIG. “But we want to look at it right now so we can give them real-time feedback.”

House Republicans recently passed, with some Democratic support, a bill that would establish an IG office within the Treasury Department to counter fraud in programs that provide funding to non-federal entities.

]]>

Inspector general group would be axed under new House GOP bill

Sean Michael Newhouse — Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:00:00 -0400

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a bill that would abolish a central group for agency inspectors general, many of whom have been fired by President Donald Trump.

The Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency is responsible for coordinating governmentwide oversight activities, overseeing investigations into senior watchdog officials and managing IG employee training.

Under the Restoring Integrity and Efficiency to Inspector General Oversight Act (H.R. 9725), however, CIGIE would shutter one year after the bill’s enactment. The Office of Management and Budget would take over establishing IG employee training standards, supervising interagency investigations and resolving jurisdictional disputes.

Last year, OMB blocked CIGIE from receiving funding for about a month-and-a-half but backtracked following objections from some Senate Republicans. At the time, White House officials said that IGs “have become corrupt, partisan and in some cases, have lied to the public.”

In addition, under the new bill, the Government Accountability Office would develop IG inspection standards and Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers would maintain at least one training academy for IG employees.

GAO in June issued a report that found CIGIE often fell short of its own process requirements when investigating misconduct allegations against IGs. For example, investigators warned that a CIGIE staffer is currently disregarding complaints they deem as “frivolous” despite internal policy that such decisions are required to be reviewed by legal counsel.

A Republican Oversight Committee aide cited that GAO report in a statement to Government Executive regarding the rationale behind the bill.

“Continued failures and abuses by [CIGIE’s] Integrity Committee have shown the inspectors general cannot be trusted to investigate wrongdoing in their ranks,” they said. “It is necessary to end the Integrity Committee and transfer CIGIE’s core functions to restore trust in the IG system.”

Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., a member of the Oversight panel, introduced the bill to scrap CIGIE on July 16 and was one of the House Republicans to request the GAO review.

In a letter to the Oversight Committee, the Project on Government Oversight nonprofit argued that transferring many of CIGIE’s responsibilities to OMB represents “a profound structural and philosophical change that should concern anyone, regardless of party, who believes oversight must remain independent of those being overseen.”

“Consider an inspector general investigating OMB’s implementation of appropriations law, impoundment decisions, grant administration or reorganization decisions within their agency. Under this legislation, OMB could simultaneously establish oversight priorities, resolve jurisdictional disputes of investigations and shape the workforce of that inspector general’s office,” wrote POGO Interim Executive Director Isabel Munilla. “This structure would create an unavoidable conflict of interest, undermining both the perception and reality of inspector general independence and fundamentally eroding public confidence in federal oversight.”

CIGIE is currently being led by Cheryl Mason, the IG for the Veterans Affairs Department and a former senior adviser to VA Secretary Doug Collins. Democrats and good government groups have questioned her ability to provide independent oversight because of her previous role in the Trump administration.

]]>

Former civil servants and union request IG investigation into transfer of Education program to Labor

Sean Michael Newhouse — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:40:47 -0400

Updated at 2:55 p.m. ET July 14

As the Trump administration continues to move federal education programs to other agencies as part of an effort to ultimately eliminate the Education Department, a federal employee union and former Education officials are asking a government watchdog to investigate the consequences of the transfers.

Specifically, the American Federation of Government Employees and ex-leaders at the Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education on Monday requested that the Education inspector general examine the interagency agreement that transferred OCTAE to the Labor Department.

OCTAE oversees programs that are related to adult education and literacy, career and technical education as well as community colleges.

The letter signers argued that the move has led to undocumented costs, such as overhauling grant infrastructure and relocating staff, and could slow decision-making due to possible jurisdictional conflicts between Labor and Education.

While the Trump administration has argued that the interagency agreements will reduce bureaucracy, the union and former officials alleged that, in certain cases, grantees now need to use several Labor grants management systems as opposed to only one Education program.

An Education spokesperson said in a statement to Government Executive that: "[T]he Trump Administration is breaking up the federal education bureaucracy and streamlining program management to ensure that all Americans are prepared for a fulfilling and meaningful career. "

An IG spokesperson said that the office hasn’t yet received the letter in question.

The Education IG recently reported that layoffs and other staff reductions at the start of Trump’s second term hindered the department’s ability to perform statutorily mandated activities. Based on federal workforce data from the Office of Personnel Management, Education’s workforce has gone from more than 4,200 in 2024 to nearly 2,300 currently.

House package

On July 9, Republicans on the House Education and Workforce Committee introduced 10 bills to codify the Education Department’s agreements with other agencies to transfer various programs.

“The legislative package reflects a simple principle: education policy should be focused on helping students succeed — not preserving a federal bureaucracy for its own sake,” said Chairman Tim Walberg, R-Mich., in a statement. “Rather than allowing unnecessary layers of Washington bureaucracy stand between families and the services they rely on, the bills would transfer key statutory authorities to agencies better equipped to carry them out while maintaining continuity for students and stakeholders."

The panel is scheduled to mark up the measures on Wednesday.

In contrast, the AFGE local for Education employees contended that the proposals would “break” the department.

“These bills are named ‘less bureaucracy,’ but they actually create many more layers of red tape for the American public and for federal employees trying to serve students and families,” said AFGE Local 252 President Rachel Gittleman in a statement. “States, grantees and taxpayers are already paying the price for education programs being unlawfully transferred to other federal agencies: funding delays, confusion and chaos for both employees and the public, wasted taxpayer dollars and no accountability or oversight.”

This story has been updated with a statement from the Education Department.

]]>

Duffy faces new ethics complaint over official social media post promoting wife’s book

Sean Michael Newhouse — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:25:00 -0400

A government oversight nonprofit requested that the inspector general for the Transportation Department look into possible ethics violations by Secretary Sean Duffy over a post on his department social media account promoting his wife’s book.

“Agency social media accounts are meant to convey important information relevant to all Americans about the agency’s work and mission — in this case DOT’s efforts to improve transportation across the country — not to highlight or promote side business projects of an agency official’s family,” wrote Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington President and CEO Donald K. Sherman in the July 7 letter.

CREW’s request centers on a post from Rachel Campos-Duffy, a Fox News host, promoting her book, which is described as “a celebration of the people, the history and the spirit that make America great, from sea to shining sea.” The official X account of the Transportation secretary, her husband, shared that post, but the letter notes that it appears to have been deleted.

Federal ethics regulations prohibit agency officials from using their position “for their own private gain,” “for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise” or “for the private gain of friends, relatives or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity.”

A DOT spokesperson, however, said in a statement to Government Executive that: “A staffer inadvertently retweeted the post, and once the error was realized it was taken down.”

In addition to assessing whether Duffy violated any ethics rules due to the social media repost, CREW’s request also calls for ensuring “sufficient internal controls” are in place to “reasonably prevent additional violations” in the future.

The Transportation IG told Government Executive that the office has no comment.

In May, CREW also requested that the department watchdog investigate whether any ethics rules were broken due to Duffy and his family’s participation in a U.S. travel web series produced by an entity backed by several transportation companies. The secretary has said that the government didn’t spend any money on the show, his family didn’t receive any financial benefits and career officials reviewed and approved his involvement.

But the watchdog nonprofit argued that the web series and social media promotion suggest a trend.

“[Duffy’s] use of his office, for at least the second time this year, to provide for the private gain of his own family shows a pattern of taking advantage of the privilege of public service to create opportunities for his family that other American families lack because they do not have access to the government’s resources,” Sherman wrote in the investigation request. “This pattern must be stopped.”

]]>

IRS missed hiring goals for 2026 tax season, which watchdog says impacted service performance

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:00 -0400

The IRS fell short of its hiring goals for certain positions ahead of the 2026 tax filing season, which a new inspector general report found caused the agency to scramble in order to fill shortfalls.

While officials were authorized to bring on 1,900 employees to process tax returns and fix related errors, the IRS was unable to fill 1,100, or about 58%, of those positions. Likewise, the division that answers taxpayer questions missed its hiring goal by 34%.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration noted that job posting announcements were held up by a new requirement for the IRS to receive approval from the Treasury Department before making certain hires. The watchdog also reported that offices were unable to onboard all of the employees they hired before the start of filing season.

Investigators found that, due to the staffing shortages, the taxpayer assistance division decreased its service performance expectation levels. They also reported that, in part because of the reduced workforce, backlogs in five of seven tax return processing programs increased.

In response to these issues, according to the report, the IRS relied on overtime and temporarily reassigned hundreds of employees. Government Executive previously reported that IRS directed many human resources and information technology employees to help with filing season workloads.

TIGTA’s interim report only looked at the 2026 filing season through Feb. 28. Tax season lasted from Jan. 26 through April 15.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service, another IRS watchdog, recently reported that the agency “performed better than expected” this tax season despite needing to implement changes to the tax code mandated by the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, employing about a quarter fewer employees due to the Trump administration’s civil service cuts and experiencing leadership turnover.

But the TAS also flagged that having fewer personnel made it harder for taxpayers to access assistance.

]]>

Despite taxing year, IRS watchdog reports mostly smooth filing season

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:46:50 -0400

Despite having to make more than 100 changes to the tax code as a result of the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, employing about a quarter fewer employees and experiencing leadership turnover, an independent IRS watchdog reported that the tax agency conducted a largely successful filing season in 2026. But the Taxpayer Advocate Service also warned that staff cuts made it harder for taxpayers who needed assistance to receive it.

“In the end, the IRS performed better than expected in most respects. The vast majority of taxpayers filed their returns successfully and received their refunds without significant delay,” National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins wrote in a Wednesday report to Congress. “IRS leadership and its workforce deserve substantial credit for that accomplishment, particularly given the extraordinary operational pressures they overcame.”

TAS reported that the IRS processed almost 99% of individual tax returns by the end of filing season. The office attributed this to stable leadership in the division responsible for tax filing as well as a “significant majority” of returns being automatedly processed through electronic submission and direct deposit.

Still, the watchdog criticized phone wait lines, the level of provided in-person assistance and the filing experience for many taxpayers who rely on paper checks.

“With fewer employees and even fewer experienced employees, personal service was harder to come by,” Collins wrote. “That translated to longer waits for assistance, fewer experienced employees available to work on complex account issues, delayed responses to correspondence and, as a result, longer case resolution times.”

In total, IRS answered 21% of calls in 2026 with an average wait time of 14 minutes compared with 25% the prior year when taxpayers waited an average of eight minutes.

The TAS noted this was somewhat by design, as the IRS prioritized assigning employees to work on responding to paper correspondence instead of answering phones because staffers often end up not performing work while waiting for a taxpayer to call.

But the watchdog flagged that the phone line for taxpayers when they are unable to pay their liability, for example, only answered 31% of the time and after an average wait of 45 minutes. Likewise, the line taxpayers need to call to prove their identities when their returns are suspected of identity theft had an answer rate of 19% with a 20-minute average wait.

The TAS also reported that the number of fully staffed Taxpayer Assistance Centers decreased to 42 from 102 in 2025 and that the Trump administration’s pivot away from paper checks contributed to delays of six weeks or more for taxpayers who requested non-electronic refunds.

“A modernized IRS can and should improve efficiency and service, but transformation should not come at the expense of accessibility, fairness or human assistance,” Collins wrote.

The National Treasury Employees Union said the TAS report shows the IRS workforce deserves praise for managing “to do more with less” but also bemoaned the reduced service availability.

“No taxpayer should be left out in the cold for needing help paying their fair share,” said NTEU National President Doreen Greenwald in a statement. “A smaller, less effective IRS undercuts the whole tax system and deprives our government of much-needed revenue.”

]]>

Education Department layoffs hindered congressionally mandated activities, inspector general reports

Sean Michael Newhouse — Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:33:55 -0400

Layoffs at the Education Department during the first two months of President Donald Trump’s second term resulted in the agency being unable to perform legally required activities, according to a report published on Monday by the department’s inspector general.

The watchdog found that many Education suboffices were left without any staffers due to reductions in force and various separation incentives, which hindered the department’s ability to perform dozens of statutory and oversight functions between Jan. 20, 2025, and March 31, 2025.

Some of the impacted activities included:

Overseeing states, nonprofits, lending institutions and servicers that are involved in federal financial aid for postsecondary students.
Managing grants to states for helping youth learn English.
Administering a congressionally mandated program that helps educational institutions acquire excess federal property.
Advising department employees on ethics matters.

The IG said that the department did not provide all requested information or allow “unfettered” access to agency staff, which restricted the investigators’ review. Education’s deputy general counsel, Philip Rosenfelt, said in a letter attached to the report that officials’ compliance was limited by court orders.

“Proceding beyond what had been shared — including information contained in, or outside of, the litigation administrative records — risked prejudicing or interfering with the department’s litigation posture and, critically, and potentially contravening the preliminary injunctions or other orders then in effect,” he wrote.

Education initiated the RIF on March 11, 2025, but the action was blocked by a federal judge in May 2025. The Supreme Court in July 2025, however, ruled that the separations could proceed.

Investigators did not consider the court orders to be a valid reason for the department’s noncompliance, arguing that the IG has “a longstanding history of reviewing and protecting sensitive department information, including materials related to ongoing litigation” and that officials never adequately explained why providing access to documents and staff would violate the preliminary injunction.

In addition, Rosenfelt requested in the letter that investigators include language that “some or all” of the department functions the IG identified as not having any assigned staffers were conducted by other offices or agencies. The IG declined.

“We cannot acknowledge, as requested by the department, that some or all of the responsibilities referenced in the report were fulfilled by the department, other agencies or through other means, as no corroborating evidence has been provided to support the department’s assertion that it has continued to discharge those responsibilities since the RIF,” investigators wrote.

In total, the IG reported that between Jan. 20, 2025, and March 31, 2025, the department, which the Trump administration is seeking to eliminate, shed 40% of its workforce, with around 1,200 due to layoffs and more than 350 from voluntary separations like the deferred resignation program.

Federal workforce data from the Office of Personnel Management shows that Education went from roughly 4,200 employees in 2024 to nearly 2,300 staffers now.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon testified before Congress in April that some of the department’s staff cuts went too far and noted that laid off Office of Civil Rights staffers were asked to return due to case backlogs.

The IG also found that Education, during the report period, terminated 129 contracts worth a total value of $1.3 billion, some of which were for legally required educational studies. And the department canceled 90 grants with total obligations of nearly $504 million. Of those grants, officials identified 153 awards for termination under a program for partnerships to train school-based mental health service providers.

Rachel Gittleman — the president of American Federation of Government Employees Local 252, which represents Education employees — contended the report “gives the public the fullest picture to date of the devastation McMahon has wrought.”

"This confirms what we've been saying all along: The Trump Administration has been systematically destroying the Education Department,” Gittleman said in a statement.

As part of the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle Education, the department has signed interagency agreements with several other agencies for them to take on various responsibilities, including most recently transferring special education programs to the Health and Human Services Department and civil rights enforcement to the Justice Department.

Education Inspector General

Education’s IG office has experienced significant leadership turnover since the start of Trump’s second term.

The president removed IG Sandra Bruce in January 2025 as part of a mass firing of the watchdogs. Then, in July 2025, he replaced acting IG René Rocque, who is also the office’s deputy, after she notified Congress that investigators had “experienced unreasonable denials and repeated delays” from the department during an investigation into the administration’s workforce reductions.

The replacement’s — Heidi Semann, who comes from the Federal Reserve OIG — tenure as acting ended at the end of 2025 due to time limits on how long officials can serve in an acting capacity. She is, however, Trump’s nominee to serve as Education IG.

Currently, Mark Priebe is the acting Education IG. He previously held a senior position in the office and appears to have shared social media posts supporting the president.

]]>

Congressional Dems demand info on revised workforce survey

Erich Wagner — Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:29:30 -0400

A group of 23 Democrats in both the House and Senate called on the Trump administration to detail its plans to administer the 2026 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, nearly a year after officials flouted federal law in cancelling it because of needed “transformation.”

Each year, the Office of Personnel Management is required by law to conduct a survey of federal employees’ workplace engagement and morale, with 16 of its questions mandated by federal regulations.

But last year, OPM Director Scott Kupor canceled the survey, citing the need to remove questions to conform with the president’s anti-diversity executive orders and to "refocus” it on performance and efficiency. OPM also scrubbed data and analysis stemming from a series of diversity-related questions added to the survey during the Biden administration and removed most demographic data about federal workers from its workforce data suite FedScope.

In a letter to Kupor last week, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Rep. James Walkinshaw, D-Va., led congressional Democrats in demanding information on when and how OPM intends to relaunch the questionnaire, which has been a key tool for agencies to improve operations and for observers to conduct oversight for decades.

“In 2025, the federal workforce experienced dramatic, and, in many cases, illegal changes,” the lawmakers wrote. “According to OPM’s own data, approximately 317,000 employees left the federal government in 2025. The Pew Research Center noted that the federal workforce decreased by 10.3% in 2025. While the FEVS is critical in any year to fulfill statutory requirements and help improve the civil service, it is deeply concerning that in a year of significant change that this survey was cancelled.”

In an interview with Federal News Network last month, Kupor said his agency is reshaping the survey to focus on “micro level” questions related to employee expectations and efficiency, and has previously touted his agency’s use of quarterly “pulse surveys” to fill in the gaps left by the cancelled FEVS. But unlike FEVS, Kupor’s reporting of the results of those surveys omits the text of the questions asked and the underlying data.

Though FEVS originally was sent to just a sample of employees across the federal government, lagging response rates led OPM to switch to a census model, which solicited all eligible workers’ response, in 2018.

The lawmakers’ letter comes as FEVS’ traditional spring administration window closes—OPM previously postponed FEVS in the fall of 2020 due to disruption caused by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. They asked for the list of questions planned for the 2026 survey, the timeline for its deployment, as well as any changes to how it solicits responses.

]]>

FEMA, OMB noms grilled on alleged political sway in government assistance

Sean Michael Newhouse — Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:08:29 -0400

In a hearing on Wednesday that featured nominees to lead a wide range of federal agencies, Senate Democrats on the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee focused their questioning on differences in politics possibly preventing individuals and groups from receiving government services.

Cameron Hamilton, the nominee to head the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was asked repeatedly about a March analysis from E&E News that found President Donald Trump approved 23% of disaster funding requests from Democratic-led states compared with 89% for Republican-run states.

“This is unacceptable,” said Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H. “The idea that Americans who need help in the wake of a tornado, or a flood or a hurricane should be treated differently based upon politics is shameful. It is un-American.”

Hamilton agreed that partisanship should not play a role in approving disaster assistance and expressed doubt that the president would reject aid to a state solely because it leans Democrat.

The nominee was also pressed about whether FEMA should increase staffing levels after the Trump administration pushed out thousands of employees.

“They are an exceptional group of public servants, but there needs to be enough of them on the ground,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. “And you will lose more of them unless you are adequately staffed.”

Hamilton didn’t directly answer the question, but he did back Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s recent decision to bring back several hundred workers who had been let go.

Last year, Trump fired Hamilton from serving as the acting chief of FEMA after he testified against the elimination of the agency, which contravened the president’s position at the time. In May, however, an administration-backed review panel recommended preserving FEMA but urged state and local governments to take on a larger share of disaster response and recovery.

Hamilton also told the senators that he wants to do a “significant IT overhaul” of the agency and, if confirmed, would release a 30-day report on areas where FEMA can reform.

Trump’s Office of Management and Budget deputy director nominee, Hal Duncan, was also asked about political influence on funding decisions. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., said that a proposed rule from the agency to overhaul the federal grantmaking process, including by requiring political appointees to approve awards to ensure they advance the president’s priorities, was creating a “climate of fear.”

She questioned if a university would lose federal research funding if it allowed a peaceful protest against the war in Iran. Duncan didn’t directly answer the question but said “this administration is committed to gold standard science.”

Duncan currently serves as a senior official at OMB.

Ranking member Gary Peters, D-Mich., said during the hearing that OMB is not cooperating with at least 14 audits from the Government Accountability Office, an independent and nonpartisan watchdog agency in the legislative branch. Likewise, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said that “OMB has been very slow to respond to some of [GAO’s] investigations.”

In response, Duncan said that he would review the audits in question.

“At one point, we had 50 open inquiries from GAO mid-last year,” he said. “We try to respond to GAO inquiries in a responsible time, while still maintaining our ability to carry out our duties in support of the administration.”

OMB Director Russell Vought has previously characterized GAO as “typically wrong and very partisan.” On several occasions, the agency has determined that the administration violated rules around impoundments, which is when the executive branch delays or withholds congressional approved spending.

In addition, Peters criticized the hearing’s “overcrowded lineup” with 11 nominees testifying — five in the first half and the other six in the second half. The ranking member also said that several of the nominees haven’t completed Office of Government Ethics financial disclosures or FBI background checks.

“It certainly looks like this committee's Republican majority is simply rubber stamping the president,” he said.

Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., responded that the committee would not vote on a nominee until all ethics reports and background investigations are complete.

Charles Baldis – the nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel, which protects federal whistleblowers from retaliation – was not asked a specific question throughout the nearly 90-minute hearing.

]]>

Who watches the watchdogs? GAO finds flaws in inspector general oversight system

Sean Michael Newhouse — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:47:02 -0400

The Government Accountability Office on Monday released a report finding that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency frequently fell short of its own process requirements when investigating misconduct allegations against agency watchdogs.

The central IG group houses the Integrity Committee, which reviews ethics complaints against IGs and other senior OIG personnel. The panel is composed of select IGs as well as representatives from the Office of Government Ethics and FBI. Between 2020 and 2025, it received more than 16,200 complaints and completed 15 investigations.

GAO investigators flagged that a CIGIE staffer is currently disregarding complaints they deem as “frivolous” despite internal policy that such decisions are required to be reviewed by the entity’s legal counsel.

“Without a process for secondary review of the [program manager’s] decisions on what constitutes a frivolous complaint, actions taken by a single individual determine whether to pursue the complaint, even if the determination is not accurate,” they wrote. “Further, it increases the risk that the IC is not reviewing relevant complaints that it should have had an opportunity to consider.”

When the program manager determines that a complaint is significant, they refer it to a group composed of the IC legal counsel and representatives from the Office of Special Counsel and Justice Department to resolve any jurisdictional issues. This group reviewed 460 cases between fiscal 2021 and 2025.

Based on a generalizable sample of 79 cases, however, GAO found that this group missed at least one timeline requirement 76% of the time. As an example, for 49% of complaints, either the DOJ or OSC did not decide whether to forward it to the broader IC within seven business days.

When the IC decides to take on a case, it identifies an IG to investigate the complaint. But GAO reported that the IC conducts "limited oversight” of such investigations.

Notably, investigators found that IGs, when requesting reimbursement from CIGIE for undertaking these investigations, provided supporting documentation that was inconsistent and incomplete in the five cases they reviewed.

“Controls are not in place to ensure that reimbursement requests are properly reviewed for accuracy and to ensure that all costs are necessary and allowable. Rather, payments are made as requested,” they wrote. “This increases the risk that the IC may pay assisting OIGs for unnecessary or unallowable costs in conducting an investigation.”

CIGIE “concurred in principle” with all eight recommendations that GAO made in the report, including to require the IC legal counsel to examine potentially frivolous complaints, improve timelines for reviewing complaints and mandate more information from IGs for investigation reimbursement requests.

While agreeing with the recommendations, CIGIE Chair Cheryl Mason, who is also the Veterans Affairs Department IG, argued that the IC’s effectiveness is undermined by structural problems, namely regular leadership changes and a reliance on other IGs for investigations.

“This decentralized model has contributed in part to timeliness issues and inconsistencies in IC investigations,” she wrote in a letter attached to the report. “Oversight of this model is complicated by the IC’s rotating membership. The six IC members — who serve in these roles as required by the statute — all hold critical, full-time positions elsewhere.”

Good government groups and congressional Democrats have questioned Mason’s ability to operate independently as CIGIE chair because, prior to her confirmation as VA IG, she served as a senior adviser to VA Secretary Doug Collins.

Along with firing nearly 20 IGs, the Trump administration in 2025 blocked CIGIE from receiving funding for more than a month.

]]>

Anti-fraud overhaul clears House despite Democratic concerns over privacy and IG independence

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:38:01 -0400

As the Trump administration prioritizes combating fraud in federal programs, the House this week passed almost a dozen bills, several of which are bipartisan, intended to strengthen agencies’ ability to detect and stop fraudulent payments.

The Fraud Prevention and Accountability Act (H.R. 8312) would establish an inspector general office within the Treasury Department dedicated solely to countering grift in programs that provide funding to non-federal entities.

This new IG for Fraud, Accountability and Recovery would subsume the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee, a panel of IGs that was created in 2020 to oversee COVID-19 spending. Congress expanded the jurisdiction of the interagency entity, however, to include programs funded by the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The measure also would authorize the Treasury to share, on a voluntary basis, data tools with state and local governments that administer federal funds in order to prevent improper payments, such as by screening potential awardees against a centralized fraud database.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., characterized the measure as “the culmination of years of work to understand how agencies can improve their operations to protect hard-earned taxpayer money from fraudsters.”

“This legislation ensures there’s a permanent governmentwide anti-fraud analytics function to assist agency inspectors general with their fraud work,” he said during floor debate on Wednesday.

Most House Democrats opposed the bill, in particular because of the transfer of the PRAC to the new IG office. The committee is currently housed under the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, a central group for the agency watchdogs that the Trump administration blocked from receiving funding for more than a month last year.

The president also has fired nearly 20 IGs and has replaced many of them with individuals who worked in his first or second administration.

“Taking the PRAC out of CIGIE and moving it to a third new Treasury IG is another attempt to weaken the case for funding CIGIE and to further dismantle what remains of a community already very severely weakened by the Trump administration,” said Rep. James Walkinshaw, D-Va., during floor debate on Wednesday.

Walkinshaw also referenced objections to the bill from nonprofits like the Center for Democracy and Technology, which argued that the data sharing provisions would result in the collection of “significantly greater amounts of sensitive information from agencies across the federal government, functionally creating a master database on all Americans.”

The House passed the measure in a 240-181 vote with the support of 28 Democrats.

Lawmakers also passed, without any recorded opposition, bills that would increase, from $10,000 to $20,000, the minimum monetary reward for federal employees whose disclosure of fraud, waste or mismanagement leads to cost savings (H.R. 428) and require certain government workers to receive training on preventing fraudulent and improper payments (H.R. 8428).

]]>

Lawmakers press for tighter oversight of fast-growing prediction markets

Amelia Twyman, States Newsroom — Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:27:58 -0400

A group of 16 Senate Democrats is calling on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to tighten its regulation of prediction markets, citing concerns over insider trading and other consumer harms as betting on future events grows in popularity.

The senators, led by Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., asked the CFTC to offer guidance to those participating in bustling prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket in an effort to restrict event contract manipulation and insider trading, according to the June 1 letter.

“The volume of event contracts trading on prediction markets has grown exponentially over the past 18 months,” the senators wrote. “These markets have a significantly higher proportion of retail participants than traditional derivatives markets, heightening customer protection concerns.”

The senators sent the letter before the CFTC proposed rules Wednesday that would ban bets on war, assassination and other extreme events, which critics said did not do enough to rein in the industry.

Lawmakers also want the CFTC to conduct detailed reviews of participating futures markets to ensure that their policies and procedures are clearly outlined and that they are equipped with adequate resources to prevent market abuse.

On a similar note, they wrote that the commission should instruct the markets to monitor the terms and conditions of event contracts, as ambiguous contract language can lead to conflicts over resolution and payout once an outcome has occurred.

“Sufficient resources should be devoted to anticipating and addressing such issues prior to contract listing, rather than after problems arise,” the senators wrote.

In addition to Klobuchar, the letter was signed by Sens. Lisa Blunt Rochester and Chris Coons of Delaware, Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, John Hickenlooper and Michael Bennet of Colorado, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico, Cory Booker and Andy Kim of New Jersey, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Raphael Warnock of Georgia, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.

Concerns around insider trading

Prediction markets allow consumers to bet on the outcomes of future events and trade in products commonly called event contracts.

Most event contracts offer two possible outcomes, presenting traders with the option to bet either “yes” or “no.” The price of each outcome at any given time, expressed as a fraction of a dollar, corresponds to the market’s forecast of an outcome occurring, with $1 meaning 100%, according to the CFTC.

That system leaves the markets vulnerable to manipulation by people with inside knowledge of an event, which is partly what prompted the Democratic senators to write the letter, they said.

For example, a U.S. soldier was charged in April with making more than $400,000 on Polymarket by betting the United States would launch a military operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Prosecutors say the soldier used classified information to make the wagers in advance of the operation.

The senators did not give the CFTC a deadline to carry out their requests. Rather, they urged the commission in their letter to consider their recommendations as it continues to develop rules and guidance for the prediction market industry.

The CFTC did not respond to States Newsroom’s request for comment in time for publication.

]]>

Inspector general group announces pick to lead oversight of Iran war following senator’s questioning

Sean Michael Newhouse — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:52:05 -0400

Last week, Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., requested that an oversight body for inspectors general assign one of the agency watchdogs to lead oversight of the war in Iran, pointing to a statutory requirement for such a designation with respect to a military “overseas contingency operation that exceeds 60 days.”

On Wednesday, the Defense Department OIG announced that it had been selected to spearhead oversight of Operation Epic Fury; although, officials said that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency made the designation on May 12.

The U.S. and Israel launched airstrikes against Iran on Feb. 28.

“This lead inspector general designation not only follows the framework required in the IG Act, it also reflects the extensive experience of the [DOD] OIG with comprehensive oversight of overseas contingency operations,” DOD IG Platte Moring said in a statement. “We are collaborating closely with our colleagues to promote accountability and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars.”

According to the announcement, the DOD OIG’s oversight of the war in Iran will be supported by the IGs for the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development. While the Trump administration folded USAID into State in 2025, the USAID OIG is still active.

When selecting an IG to lead oversight of an overseas military operation, the CIGIE chair is limited to choosing the IG for DOD, State or USAID.

Moring was confirmed as the DOD IG in December 2025. He previously served as deputy general counsel at the department during Trump’s first term. Likewise, Cheryl Mason, who was elected as CIGIE chair in March, was confirmed in summer 2025 as the IG at the Veterans Affairs Department after a stint as a senior adviser to VA Secretary Doug Collins.

Government oversight advocates and congressional Democrats have criticized the president’s penchant for placing individuals, such as Moring and Mason, who have worked in his first or second administration in IG roles and questioned whether they can provide true independent oversight. Moring, though, received bipartisan support during his confirmation hearing.

As the designee, he will be responsible for developing a strategy for oversight of the war in Iran, reviewing the accuracy of associated spending information provided by federal agencies and resolving any jurisdictional crossovers. He also will be required to issue regular public reports on his office’s activities. The DOD OIG said the first quarterly report would be issued in the fall.

Duckworth celebrated Wednesday’s announcement.

“Now, as lead IG, the DOD IG must work expeditiously with his counterparts to conduct independent oversight of all programs and operations in support of President Trump’s costly, disastrous war, and — as I have requested — brief me on these matters without delay,” she said in a statement.

Relatedly, Trump on Monday nominated Carl Anderson to be State IG. The office confirmed to Government Executive that he is a former federal attorney, congressional staffer and has been a legal adviser at State since April 2025.

At the start of his second term, the president fired the former State IG as well as the watchdogs at 16 other agencies.

]]>

USPS financial crisis won’t be solved until Congress defines its service mission, regulator testifies

Sean Michael Newhouse — Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:49:32 -0400

The U.S. Postal Service’s regulator on Thursday argued that the agency’s financial woes will not be resolved until Congress sets up a funding system for the USPS that supports its desired service requirements, echoing calls from the agency’s leadership and other oversight entities.

“Only by first specifically defining what America needs of its postal service and what that costs will Congress then truly know how best to fix the fundamental funding structure while preserving appropriate service and delivery standards,” said Robert Taub, the vice chairman of the Postal Regulatory Commission, before the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Operations.

Postmaster General David Steiner testified to the panel in March that USPS could run out of money as soon as this fall. Because the PRC in April authorized the agency to temporarily suspend certain employer contributions to the Federal Employees Retirement System, however, Taub said that the looming financial cliff has been pushed back by several years.

“This is not a panacea nor a permanent or long-term fix to the postal service's problems, but it does allow Congress an opportunity to enact thoughtful and fundamental change as opposed to choices of desperation,” he said.

At the time, USPS officials said the FERS suspension would not cause “any immediate detrimental impact to current or future retirees,” and the PRC noted that the agency had only been making partial payments in recent years.

In March, Steiner also told the Government Reform Subcommittee that changes were needed to USPS’ self-sustaining business model and/or its service expectations: “If you want the same number of delivery days and post offices, we can do that, but someone has to pay for it. If you want to have a discussion about reducing services, we can do that.”

The Government Accountability Office also has long reported that USPS’ current business model is unsustainable.

Both Subcommittee Chairman Pete Sessions, R-Texas, and ranking member Kweisi Mfume, D-Md., agreed on Thursday that lawmakers need to reach agreement on what USPS service standards will be going forward in order to shore up the postal agency’s finances.

“If we don't do that, then we've just not done anything,” Mfume said. “I mean, we've just kicked the ball down the road.”

In addition to structural reform, Steiner and the USPS Board of Governors have called on Congress to increase the postal agency’s $15 billion statutory debt limit in response to the financial shortfalls. But Sessions expressed doubts about that proposal.

“There is no reason to assume additional borrowed funds infused into this unintended business model would be anything more than throwing good money at bad results,” he said.

Also during the hearing, PRC commissioners and members of both parties criticized Delivering for America — an ongoing postal modernization plan started by former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy that he predicted would enable USPS to break even by fiscal 2023 generally by slowing some delivery and increasing the prices of certain products. But the agency experienced a net loss of $2 billion in the most recent quarter.

]]>

GSA joins White House’s fraud prevention task force

Edward Graham — Fri, 29 May 2026 09:00:00 -0400

The General Services Administration announced on Thursday that it is joining the White House’s anti-fraud task force, a move that enlists a key federal acquisition agency into President Donald Trump’s self-described “war on fraud.”

The unit, led by Vice President JD Vance, was created by a March executive order and is tasked with rooting out waste, fraud and abuse across federal benefits programs.

GSA said in a press release that it is “uniquely positioned to help the Task Force detect irregularities, accelerate investigations, and safeguard taxpayer dollars,” with members of the anti-fraud unit “now leveraging GSA’s unmatched reach in acquisition, shared services, technology modernization, and federal real estate.”

Although the order establishing the task force emphasized efforts to identify federal benefits fraud, GSA said it will support the unit’s work by identifying waste, fraud and abuse across government contracting programs.

“GSA sits at the center of the federal acquisition and contracting ecosystem, making us a critical force in the fight against fraud,” GSA Administrator Edward Forst said in a statement, adding that the agency “will bring advanced analytical capabilities, investigative support, and cross-government coordination to help expose high-risk fraud patterns and stop bad actors from exploiting taxpayer-funded systems.”

Trump’s directive establishing the task force also granted it the authority to withhold funds from states and local jurisdictions “that do not have adequate anti-fraud requirements.”

The effort has been clouded by allegations of political bias, however, with the order creating the unit notably calling out Democrat-led states and accusing public officials of intentionally failing to police benefits programs so migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border can receive assistance.

Vance said earlier this month the unit was “deferring” $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursements to California and threatened to withhold payments from other states if they do not adequately enhance their efforts to combat fraud in federal benefits programs. That came after the White House kicked off its anti-fraud push in February by announcing that it was withholding over $240 million in Medicaid funds from Minnesota following claims about the misuse of funds in the state’s social services programs.

]]>

Citing legal requirement, senator wants a designated inspector general to provide oversight of Iran war

Sean Michael Newhouse — Thu, 28 May 2026 15:01:00 -0400

Updated at 3:58 p.m. ET May 28

A Democratic senator on Thursday requested that an inspector general oversight body designate one of the agency watchdogs to spearhead reviews of the ongoing war in Iran, citing a requirement in federal statute.

In her letter, Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., pointed to a provision in the U.S. Code mandating that the chair of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency tap an IG to head oversight of a military “overseas contingency operation that exceeds 60 days.”

The U.S. and Israel launched airstrikes against Iran on Feb. 28.

“IG quarterly reporting, audits, inspections and investigations related to OCOs have promoted valuable transparency and accountability across presidential administrations and enable federal agencies to be better stewards of taxpayer dollars,” Duckworth wrote. “The need for you to appoint a lead IG to advance these aims and conduct joint, comprehensive and independent oversight of contingency operations against Iran has never been greater, as the Trump administration’s explanations of the president’s purported mission, lines of effort and desired end states with respect to Iran are constantly shifting, and often contradict themselves.”

Defense Department officials have testified that the war has cost an estimated $29 billion.

The CIGIE chair is limited to selecting the IG for the Defense Department, State Department or U.S. Agency for International Development. While the Trump administration folded USAID into State in 2025, the USAID IG office is still active.

The designated IG would be responsible for developing a strategy for oversight of the military operation, reviewing the accuracy of associated spending information provided by federal agencies and resolving any jurisdictional crossovers. They also would be required to issue regular public reports on their activities.

In her letter, Duckworth argued that the war in Iran meets the definition of an OCO because Operation Epic Fury is identified as one in the DOD’s casualty database and because members of the National Guard have been deployed to the region. Under federal statute, if a military action includes ordering a member of the National Guard to active duty, that qualifies it as a “contingency operation.”

Duckworth requested that CIGIE Chair Cheryl Mason provide her selection for the IG by June 5. Mason also is the IG for the Veterans Affairs Department.

Andrew Cannarsa, CIGIE's executive director, said in a statement to Government Executive that the council has "received the letter from Senator Duckworth and is working to address the senator’s inquiry."

The senator has criticized Mason’s confirmation as VA IG and election to CIGIE chair because she previously served as a senior adviser to VA Secretary Doug Collins. As such, Duckworth and good government groups have contended that Mason cannot provide independent oversight.

This story has been updated with a statement from CIGIE.

]]>

Labor oversight official faces ethics complaint for apparent congressional campaign moves

Sean Michael Newhouse — Thu, 28 May 2026 07:00:00 -0400

A government watchdog nonprofit on Tuesday requested an investigation into whether Anthony D’Esposito, the inspector general for the Labor Department, violated the Hatch Act, a law that restricts the political activity of civil servants.

The Project on Government Oversight’s complaint to the Office of Special Counsel, which enforces that law, argues that the former GOP lawmaker ran afoul of ethics rules by seeming to take steps preparing for another congressional run as a confirmed IG, a position that oversees independent audits and investigations of agency operations.

“We can't have inspectors general that are seen as attachments of the president or attachments of the agency,” said Joe Spielberger, a senior policy counsel at POGO, in an interview with Government Executive. “[If so] it means that when [the IGs] receive complaints, there's no guarantee that they will take those complaints seriously if they're directed against the executive branch or the party in power.”

In its complaint, POGO flagged several potential violations including:

D’Esposito’s campaign committee is still active based on the Federal Election Commission’s website.
Shortly after he was sworn in, he said during a radio interview that: “there’s no question that we’re exploring” a run for Congress,” “we’re doing the polling [and] we’re talking to people on the ground and we want to make sure that the resources are going to be there,” his Democratic successor is a “disastrous member of Congress” and that it’s important for Republican candidates to have funding to deliver effective campaign messaging.
Media reports that D’Esposito was planning to announce his candidacy.

Under the Hatch Act, there is a prohibition on federal employees from being candidates in partisan elections, which extends to preliminary activities such as conducting polls, having campaign strategy meetings or authorizing others to take such actions on their behalf. The law also bars government workers from engaging in political activity in their official capacity and from soliciting or receiving political contributions.

While D’Esposito ultimately opted not to enter the race, Spielberger argued that an OSC investigation is still warranted.

“His decision to withdraw his name from potential candidacy doesn't absolve him from what are potentially previous violations of the Hatch Act,” he said.

POGO’s complaint also notes that D’Esposito frequently shares political social media posts, such as ones criticizing Democratic immigration policies, praising congressional Republicans and echoing slogans associated with President Donald Trump.

Under federal law, IGs are required to be appointed “without regard to political affiliation.”

In an interview with Bloomberg Law published on Wednesday, however, D’Esposito said that he didn’t see any issue with his public statements.

“I’m never going to shy away from the fact that I’m a conservative Republican,” he said. “I’m never going to shy away from the fact that I support the agenda, especially as it pertains to this office, just because I want to maintain an appearance. That’s absolutely ridiculous.”

In April, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington nonprofit requested that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, an oversight body for the watchdogs, investigate D’Esposito over matters similarly raised by POGO.

Trump recently nominated Charles Baldis to lead the OSC. Baldis is a former Senate staffer and current chief counsel at the agency who has been the designee of the OSC’s acting chief since spring 2025.

The president’s first OSC nominee, Paul Ingrassia, withdrew in October 2025 following objections from Senate Republicans over reports of sexual harassment accusations and racist text messages.

In March 2025, Trump removed the incumbent special counsel — Hampton Dellinger, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden — before the end of his five-year term. On one of the first days of his second term, the president also fired IGs at 18 agencies, including the DOL IG who D’Esposito later replaced.

The DOL OIG did not respond to a request for comment, but D’Esposito has previously testified that he is “well aware of the Hatch Act.”

]]>