![EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has beefed up his security detail in additional installing the booth.](https://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/cd/2017/12/14/121417pruitt/860x394.jpg?1626834851)
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has beefed up his security detail in additional installing the booth. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
EPA Inspector General Takes on Scott Pruitt’s Soundproof Booth
House Democrats had complained administrator may have violated appropriations law.
The watchdog for the Environmental Protection Agency late last week acceded to House Democrats’ demands that his office investigate the widely reported installation of a customized $25,000 soundproof booth in the office of Administrator Scott Pruitt.
In a Dec. 8 letter to Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., of the Energy and Commerce Committee, IG Arthur Elkins confirmed that questions on whether expenses for the booth for the privacy-conscious administrator “comply with appropriations law” are a legitimate project for the office to pursue. Elkins stressed, however, that other work and a tight budget leave him uncertain as to the timing of the probe.
The IG just released its annual plan for fiscal 2018, which includes previously announced investigations into Pruitt’s travels and whether the administrator’s Protective Service Detail has effective controls to prevent time-and-attendance abuse.
Pruitt, whose controversial changes at the agency have prompted death threats, has beefed up his security detail in addition to installing the booth designed to prevent hacking or wiretapping. He has said the privacy equipment is needed for his private calls with the White House and other executive branch officials.
The booth was installed by a Richmond, Va.-based contractor called Acoustical Solutions, according to The Washington Post, and reportedly required an additional $7,978 expenditure to remove an existing closed-circuit TV to make room in Pruitt’s office.
The House Democrats asked investigators to determine the costs and justification for the privacy booth, “the policies and procedures in place to ensure proper use, i.e., for official communication only, of the facility; and which EPA officials reviewed and approved the purchase of the facility.”
The letter from Pallone and colleagues added that the installation “comes after a troubling report earlier in the summer that EPA instituted extreme restrictions at its headquarters, including prohibiting employees from carrying cell phones and taking notes in meetings with administrator Pruitt, restricting movement within the building and requiring escorts.”